An SI.com and CNN Network Site
An SI.com and CNN Network Site. Visit SI.com An SI.com and CNN Network Site. Visit CNN.com Subscribe to Sports Illustrated Golf Plus Subscribe to Golf Magazine
Skip to main content
SI GOLFNation

Join the Nation!

Keep up with your scores, stats and golf buddies with our new game-tracking and social-networking tool.

With a diluted field, the WGC events are about the easiest events to win


Published: March 19, 2008

  • Share
  • Single Page
  • E-mail
  • Print
  • Sign up for free newsletter

Miami, Fla. — There are two obvious reasons why Tiger Woods dominates the World Golf Championships events (he's won 15 of 26): One, and this may come as a shock, he's really good (Man, I love breaking big news.); Two, the WGC events are just about the easiest events in golf to win.

The only easier marks are the Tour Championship, which is small even by corporate outing standards with a 30-man field (or 28 if Tiger and Phil Mickelson stay home), and the winners-only Mercedes Championships (31 players this year with Tiger and Phil coincidentally staying home). So to those who always point out that one of Byron Nelson's 11 straight wins was a two-man team event (with his partner Jug McSpaden), I say the Tour and Mercedes Championships may be even more deserving of asterisks.

Then there are the WGCs. This week's field at Doral features 79 players, about half of what the U.S. Open will have. Ten of those select 79 players (about 13 percent) cannot be found in the top 100 of the Official World Golf Rankings. Yes, your elite field this week includes S.S.P. Chowrasia (no relation to the S.S. Minnow), Chapchai Nirat (not the sound made when you get up from a vinyl seat cover on a hot summer's day), Andrew McLardy (not the illegitimate son of Mayor McCheese), and Paul Sheehan (the 249th best player on the planet). Let the awe wash over you for a moment.

Tiger must beat only half as many opponents as usual. No wonder he probably debated whether to name his baby daughter Sam, Earlette or WGC. (All right, I may have made that up. All right, I definitely made it up.)

Golf is a game of numbers. On any given day with a full field of 156 (or even 144) players, at least a dozen or more are going to light it up with birdies. Why? Because they're just that good. With the WGC's half-full, half-empty field, the prospects of that happening are far less. Fewer low rounds equals less excitement.

The counter argument that the world's top 50 players are in the field is a good one. They are here, and that's about all who is here. The WGCs are like a Vegas showgirl — top-heavy but lacking depth. (With apologies to Vegas showgirl-scientists everywhere.)

Lowery won at Pebble Beach in February. He's not at Doral. Lucas Glover starred on the Presidents Cup team last fall. He's not here. Brian Gay recently scored his first career win. Not here. British Open champion Padraig Harrington is missing in action by choice, but how about Steve Flesch? He won two PGA Tour tournaments last year and finished among the top 30 on the money list. He's exempt into three of the four majors in 2008 and the WGC event in Akron. Yet he's not here.