Ping unveils plan to make equipment a factor in golfers' handicaps

Should a player who uses an antiquated persimmon driver to shoot an 80 have a lower handicap than a golfer who shoots the same score on the same course with a modern driver? Ping CEO John Solheim says yes, and he has applied for a patent on a handicapping system that would account for a golfer's equipment in addition to scores and course conditions. Here's the release from Ping:

PHOENIX (Dec. 19, 2012) – PING Chairman & CEO John Solheim
announced today he’s applied for a patent that uses an equipment rating formula
as a factor in calculating a golfer’s handicap. The pursuit of the patent,
according to Solheim, is to ensure amateur golfers who want more options in
playing the game have another choice allowing them to do so in a globally
available format.
“The tone
coming from the USGA and R&A in recent years suggests another significant
equipment rollback may not be far away,” said Solheim, who applied for the
patent in June of 2011. “We’ve already seen it with the groove rule and the
proposed rule banning anchoring. We continue to hear whispers of more
changes.  But as
we’re also reading on the proposed anchoring ban, many directly involved in the
game favor more equipment options, not fewer. I’m looking for ways to keep the
game enjoyable for every level of golfer.”
The patent
application details numerous scenarios in which equipment could be rated (balls
that go varying distances, for example) and are also factored in with current
variables, such as the challenge presented by each individual course.   Solheim suggests the
expanded equipment options could be approved as
“Conditions of Competition” so the new method of handicapping could exist
within the current set of rules.
“One of the goals of this concept is to get people thinking outside the “traditional” box
that seems to have been built around golf – due primarily to the influence of
the professional game,” said Solheim. “This alternative approach to
handicapping gives golfers the options to play and enjoy the game with the goal
of keeping one set of rules. All of us who are part of this industry need to be
looking forward to ensure the game grows in both appeal and participation. This
is just one example of things we should be considering.”

More From the Web

HOLE YARDS PAR R1 R2 R3 R4
OUT
HOLE YARDS PAR R1 R2 R3 R4
IN